Appeals court finds Google infringed on Oracle's Java

FILE - In this March 20, 2012, file photo, a plane flies over Oracle headquarters in Redwood City, Calif. On Tuesday, March 27, 2018, a federal appeals court overturned a decision in a long-running legal battle over whether Google infringed on Oracle's Java programming language to build its hugely popular mobile operating system, Android. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

A federal appeals court has overturned a decision in a long-running legal battle over whether Google infringed on Oracle's Java programming language to build its hugely popular mobile operating system, Android

MENLO PARK, Calif. — A federal appeals court has overturned a decision in a long-running legal battle over whether Google infringed on Oracle's Java programming language to build its hugely popular mobile operating system, Android.

The court said Google's use of Java was "not fair" and sent the case back to trial to determine damages.

Oracle had originally sought $9 billion. The court said Android helped Google earn $42 billion in advertising revenue since the first Android phone went on sale in 2008.

Oracle hailed Tuesday's ruling, saying the opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal District "upholds fundamental principles of copyright law."

A Google spokesman said the ruling was disappointing and that it "will make apps and online services more expensive for users." The company said it is considering its options.

The court weighed whether Google's copying of 11,500 lines of Java code at the core of its Android operating system amounted to fair use and found it did not.

Judge Kathleen O'Malley, writing for the three judges hearing the case, rejected Google's argument that use of the code was non-commercial; found it wasn't "transformative" since the copied code performed exactly as Oracle intended; and that Google's development of Android robbed Oracle of the ability to make money from its Java SE platform for mobile devices.

In fact, Java SE had already been in phones from companies like BlackBerry and Nokia. The court said that Amazon used the fact that Android was given out free to manufacturers to negotiate a steep discount on Java SE for use in an early Kindle tablet. Amazon later switched to using a modified version of Android.

"There is nothing fair about taking a copyrighted work verbatim and using it for the same purpose and function as the original in a competing platform," O'Malley wrote.

It's the second time this appeals court has dealt with the case.

U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup sided with Google in 2012, ruling that so-called "application programming interfaces" (APIs) weren't protected by copyright. The appeals court overturned Alsup's ruling and sent the case back for a second trial, in which a jury also found in Google's favor in May 2016. Both companies appealed that decision.

Shares of Google parent Alphabet fell 4.5 percent Tuesday to close at $1,006.94, while Oracle shares also fell 2.4 percent to close at $45.38.

Related News

4 malnourished Hawaiian monk seals taken to...

Aug 25, 2016

Biologists say four malnourished Hawaiian monk seals have been taken from remote atolls to a Big...

SpaceX Dragon returns to Earth with station...

Aug 26, 2016

A SpaceX Dragon capsule is back on Earth with scientific gifts from the International Space Station

Obama creates world's largest marine protected...

Aug 26, 2016

President Barack Obama will quadruple in size a marine national monument created by President...

State: Benghazi emails involving Clinton...

Aug 30, 2016

The State Department says about 30 emails that may be related to the 2012 attack on U.S. compounds...

Google to expand Waze carpooling service in San...

Aug 30, 2016

Google is set to expand a San Francisco carpooling program that could morph into a showdown with...

Rare whale's recovery hurt by entanglements,...

Aug 31, 2016

Scientists say the ability of an endangered species of Atlantic whale to recover is jeopardized by...

Sign up now!